topic: [[Teaming by Amy Edmondson]] people: #people/dandwerkis | #people/scottweingart created: 2023-07-02 *Not ad hoc, not intact, a collision of intact teams.* This reminds me of [[ad hoc team]] but the difference is that people in both groups already have ideas about how their teams are supposed to work. It's kind of like [[The best indicator of future conflict is past unresolved conflict]] as an idea about what is likely to occur with some smash teams. Smash teams exists when you take two relatively intact teams and smash them together, you get a smash team. [[Negotiate to Optimize not Compromise]], but how do you negotiate this new arrangement quickly? [[Explicit disagreement is better than implicit misunderstanding]], so you better put your [[Mental Model]] on the table and [[name it to tame it]]. ##### What would the opposite argument be? Each team is good at what they do, so just do it. ##### What else? How would [[Name Claim Aim - Leading with Good Judgment]] work for a smash team? tags: #note/idea | #on/team | #on/simulation ##### Sources: https://emcrit.org/emcrit/emergency-teams-dan-dworkis/