topic: [[Learning]] created: 2023-05-07 *Knowing **how** is it's own way of transformation.* This reminds me of [[Knowledge-Implementation Gap]], "doing and knowing are different things and separated by a huge gap." #people/robertsimon It's kind of like [[The human brain is designed primarily for guiding action]], and [[Deciding]] is a key part of the step of doing. _Procedural knowing_ is one of the four ways of knowing per #people/johnvervaeke, knowing how _can_ and _should_ be separated from knowing when and knowing that. Using the [[ways of knowing]] as a model can help differentiate steps in the acquisition of knowledge, and can be linked well to the [[SimZones]] model, knowing how is a Zone 1-> Zone 2 ways of knowing. When [[Assessing]] it is still important to ask as an assessor: - "How will I know if they hold [[Procedural knowing]]?" ##### What would the opposite argument be? - Knowing how and doing, are they the same thing? - How does this come out when [[🐓 Idea Farm/2 Idea Guides/Growing Idea Guides/Teaming|Teaming]], can we separate the **doing as a team** from the individuals knowing how? Or, is the team production of doing an [[emergence]], a phenomenon that must emerge from the between of the members of the team. - What role does context play in procedural knowing? - Is it possible to separate knowing that and knowing how, or are they inexorably intertwined as claimed in [[🐓 Idea Farm/4 Short Form Writing/Understanding by Design|Understanding by Design]]? tags: #note/idea | #on/knowledge | #on/skill ##### Sources: ## John Vervaeke | The Four Kinds of Knowing: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5ou03TeAvKs _John Vervaeke’s Brilliant 4P/3R Metatheory of Cognition | Psychology Today_, 2021 https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/theory-knowledge/202101/john-vervaeke-s-brilliant-4p3r-metatheory-cognition\